tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post3574541471606311469..comments2024-03-24T05:20:57.142-04:00Comments on NHL Tournament of Logos: The Rest Of The WorstChrishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05730650488637033179noreply@blogger.comBlogger42125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-7454069087173409922008-01-12T22:10:00.000-05:002008-01-12T22:10:00.000-05:00Well, just for the record, I think the Canadiens' ...Well, just for the record, I think the Canadiens' logo is awful. They've got a letter for the country and a letter for the sport. It would be like a baseball team whose logo was a big "U" (for "United States") with a "B" (for "baseball") inside it.Danielhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15958147835100901812noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-23218363312169717802008-01-12T11:56:00.000-05:002008-01-12T11:56:00.000-05:00Aw come on, you guys are just picking on the Canuc...Aw come on, you guys are just picking on the Canucks now. The only logo that deserves to be here is that skate logo. The stick n' rink isn't even as simple as the habs logo but somehow the Canadiens escape because people say "Oo it's sooo classic." The Canucks logo has been around since the seventies, that's pretty of old. And that V logo wasn't even a logo, the was a logo on the shoulders. The Kylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03549532371595555622noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-18552241198510887902008-01-11T16:46:00.000-05:002008-01-11T16:46:00.000-05:00stupid NFLi meant to say the Bruins not the BearsA...stupid NFL<BR/><BR/>i meant to say the Bruins not the Bears<BR/><BR/><BR/>Also i think there isnt enough Vancouver on this thing what about the 2 orcas they should be on this thing to.<BR/><BR/>My idea for the next tournament<BR/>"Quest for the Worst:Canucks Edition"sjsharks112https://www.blogger.com/profile/15414006989737067103noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-18620744060454811302008-01-11T12:02:00.000-05:002008-01-11T12:02:00.000-05:00Ooooooooh I beg to differ....Ooooooooh I beg to differ....Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10681292100686630749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-6765697644599527802008-01-11T11:14:00.000-05:002008-01-11T11:14:00.000-05:00Hi Chris,This is the first time I actually have a ...Hi Chris,<BR/><BR/>This is the first time I actually have a complaint about one of your tourneys.<BR/><BR/>The canucks V is absolutely NOT a logo. The primary logo during that time period was the skate logo. It was worn on the shoulders instead of the front of the jersey. If this was a jersey tourney that V jersey could easily win as the worst. You really need to swap the V for the orca. Even in Nathanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14818542859247474940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-64455519060304293132008-01-11T09:05:00.000-05:002008-01-11T09:05:00.000-05:00also i would pick you for some type of award show ...also i would pick you for some type of award show for the nominations i like the way the vid works. Obviously you have done this before(i dont mean first one)sjsharks112https://www.blogger.com/profile/15414006989737067103noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-11000989144095983712008-01-11T09:02:00.000-05:002008-01-11T09:02:00.000-05:00if the 76-95 Bears Secondary doesnt win this i cal...if the 76-95 Bears Secondary doesnt win this i call shinanigans...<BR/><BR/>this post should have been 4th or 5th but i could never get the stupid word verification picture to pop up :(sjsharks112https://www.blogger.com/profile/15414006989737067103noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-75153932945217502592008-01-11T08:31:00.000-05:002008-01-11T08:31:00.000-05:00The Rangers logo indeed deserves to be on this lis...The Rangers logo indeed deserves to be on this list. Nothing about it screams hockey. At least the Caps word mark has a stick, puck, and some stars on it, and a subliminal net.Whiter Magehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06862726277868219743noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-25506096000528135142008-01-10T23:55:00.000-05:002008-01-10T23:55:00.000-05:00Love that bass lineLove that bass lineUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10681292100686630749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-80372245224651929232008-01-10T22:09:00.000-05:002008-01-10T22:09:00.000-05:00The Orca is the best logo if the canucks win the c...The Orca is the best logo if the canucks win the cup with it :P<BR/><BR/>4 canucks logos, no oilers wordmark. It says oilers in big ugly letters. Thats the WHOLE primary.Totally Not Ryan Krasmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17757398827669257912noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-62195880468277032522008-01-10T18:04:00.000-05:002008-01-10T18:04:00.000-05:00Canucklehead and Curtle are spot on. The corporate...Canucklehead and Curtle are spot on. The corporate birthing Orca should be on the list without question. The Stick 'n Rink C and the Skate said "Canucks" and they both said hockey. The main problem was that the club has not won the Cup. The Orca looks like Grover from Sesame Street demonstrating heavy and light.Andrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03534740054503197278noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-21968396367669624502008-01-10T17:16:00.000-05:002008-01-10T17:16:00.000-05:00For people posting the comments about the logos in...For people posting the comments about the logos involved, give it a rest. You are the ones who should have nominated other logos, and this isnt easy organize, give him a break. If it isnt the worst in your opinion than dont vote for them, easy as that. <BR/><BR/>And to Chris thanks for the explanation about the Canucks logo. I dont see ALOT of differences but I guess the changes make people happy.Ryan Faithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13514883701938249746noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-28893323972025551392008-01-10T17:07:00.000-05:002008-01-10T17:07:00.000-05:00It always depends what you think is worst.You coul...It always depends what you think is worst.<BR/><BR/>You could look as a good looking logo but the logo don't match with the team or the city. Take the New York Islanders Captain fishstick. It is not a bad logo. It is pretty and well done but because it looks too much like Captain Highliner Fish product it became an instant joke on the canadian side of the border!<BR/><BR/>Other look too cartoonyUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03817098977106334074noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-60907471740080205782008-01-10T16:47:00.000-05:002008-01-10T16:47:00.000-05:00why are the canes up there their logo makes sense ...why are the canes up there their logo makes sense and actually looks like a professional logo.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03967650741714667640noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-36017914761480795642008-01-10T15:45:00.000-05:002008-01-10T15:45:00.000-05:00But when the Canucks logos were pitted against eac...<I>But when the Canucks logos were pitted against each other, the stick-in-rink won by a huge margin over the flying skate and birthing whale. So you put the vintage logo in, not once but twice, over a logo that was already judged to be worse? By your logic it shouldn't qualify.</I><BR/><BR/>Actually, you make an excellent point. I'm sure that's little consolation but I was really only Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05730650488637033179noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-7289850644013114722008-01-10T15:38:00.000-05:002008-01-10T15:38:00.000-05:00This is because the V was the only thing on those ...<I> This is because the V was the only thing on those jerseys, there was no logo; contrary to the Flames' where these also was a logo involved. Am I correct Chris?</I><BR/><BR/>Close, but actually the black and red ("flying skate") logo was featured prominently on the shoulders of those jerseys despite the fact that it was the primary. Aside from the fact that a number of people nominated it, I Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05730650488637033179noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-57559837224840738662008-01-10T15:31:00.000-05:002008-01-10T15:31:00.000-05:00I also don't get why the striping pattern of tha c...<I>I also don't get why the striping pattern of tha canucks is in there. If it's the case, why not the techtonic plates of the Flames? These ones were terrible.</I><BR/><BR/>This is because the V was the only thing on those jerseys, there was no logo; contrary to the Flames' where these also was a logo involved. Am I correct Chris?Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11683820112971469195noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-97543970554329452008-01-10T12:23:00.000-05:002008-01-10T12:23:00.000-05:00how that ugly stick and rink (1st gen) made is so ...how that ugly stick and rink (1st gen) made is so far in the last tourny i'll never know. Can't wait for this one to start.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08971612004088485159noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-56438045660086977722008-01-10T08:57:00.000-05:002008-01-10T08:57:00.000-05:00Great tournament idea.Mmm, when I look at some log...Great tournament idea.<BR/><BR/>Mmm, when I look at some logos, the secondary Boston is pretty ugly. It looks like a bad panther with blood on the mouth.<BR/><BR/>Also, that ugly/stupid Pucky should be hight on winning.<BR/><BR/>I totally agreed that Rangers logo have nothing to do in that contest. Put it against the slug/Anaheim/Pucky for a pass.<BR/><BR/>I also don't get why the striping Sephirothhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00747541322849368834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-17785798790142399252008-01-10T04:54:00.000-05:002008-01-10T04:54:00.000-05:00In fact, the stick-in-rink logo used now is very d...<I>In fact, the stick-in-rink logo used now is very different from the one used in the 1970s. Part of the criteria for logos in this tournament was that they could not have made it past the first round of any previous tournament they had already been a part of. Otherwise that would've meant there was at least one logo you guys thought it was better than — obviously meaning it wasn't the worst.</Icanuckleheadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06331125050216615498noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-38134715288005727102008-01-10T02:21:00.000-05:002008-01-10T02:21:00.000-05:00Wow, how the the Thrashers dodge that bullet?Wow, how the the Thrashers dodge that bullet?Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04252496510203823320noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-33595697081802767532008-01-10T02:14:00.000-05:002008-01-10T02:14:00.000-05:00I dont get it, the Canucks' stick in the rink is i...I dont get it, the Canucks' stick in the rink is in the worst logo pool, yet it finished 2nd in the last tournament.Ryan Faithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13514883701938249746noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-44030157754461202482008-01-10T01:10:00.000-05:002008-01-10T01:10:00.000-05:00Wow... who voted for the Rangers logo? That's like...Wow... who voted for the Rangers logo? That's like the most classic logo in the league.<BR/><BR/>Also, I have to say... as bad as the Canucks' logo history is, I think the tournament is piling on a bit. The "V" wasn't really a logo - just a striping pattern. And having both stick-in-rink logos seems kind of unfair when they're essentially the same logo.Danielhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15958147835100901812noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-56175610730273800042008-01-10T00:33:00.000-05:002008-01-10T00:33:00.000-05:00Can't wait for this to get started!Can't wait for this to get started!DaneykoIsGodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17610157317845222811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2419524927872665062.post-28949213667533788302008-01-09T23:21:00.000-05:002008-01-09T23:21:00.000-05:00Ok, hold on a sec. The original stick-n-rink logo ...Ok, hold on a sec. The original stick-n-rink logo is in there twice? Simply because it's has a different colour scheme? That's cheap IMO. <BR/><BR/>And I have no problem having four Canuck logos in there, but the fact that the birthing whale isn't included anywhere is just wrong.canuckleheadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06331125050216615498noreply@blogger.com